Emissions critical: How to solve the aftertreatment diagnostics dilemma

Uptime takes a big hit when technicians struggle to diagnose problems in the aftertreatment system. This is a top maintenance challenge for many fleets, requiring a focus on tools, training, and analytical skills.
July 22, 2025
7 min read

Aftertreatment systems have improved by leaps and bounds since 2010 when diesel particulate filters and selective catalytic reduction became standard on heavy-duty diesel trucks. These systems capture more harmful emissions and are more reliable, while fleets better understand what it takes to keep them performing properly.

Cojali offers various in-person and online training through Jaltest University. Courses range from the scan tool basics to more direct training on DEF systems and NOx sensors.

“If you get a NOx sensor code, you can’t just replace that sensor,” he said. “You must first diagnose the problem that caused the high NOx. Just replacing a sensor when it’s only providing an indication of trouble ends up being frustrating for both the technician and customer.”

A fleet that does this not only spends hundreds on the sensor but must also factor in the downtime and labor costs. And the worst part is that the problem, hiding somewhere upstream undiagnosed, has not been resolved, either.

Powell noted such problems can range all the way from an exhaust system leak that deprives the DOC and DPF of necessary exhaust heat to a failed air dryer desiccant filter. Debris from that filter can clog the air supply, which enables the fuel doser (or seventh injector) to work, thus interfering with the doser’s job of keeping the DOC and DPF hot.

These two interlinked components must remain hot enough to burn off hydrocarbons, and especially particulate that’s trapped by the DPF until it combusts. Powell said another root cause may be an EGR valve not closing properly, which can result in excessive soot clogging the DPF.

Intimately knowing the system, combined with experience, helps techs like Powell dig down to the root cause more quickly.

It also involves upgrading the most valuable diagnostic tool at your disposal: your tech’s brain. The ability to logically trace the symptoms to the root cause takes a specific mindset. Two methodologies, the fishbone diagram and the 5 whys, can help a tech organize their thoughts—and possible causes and effects—more clearly to systematically discern the root cause. To best apply these strategies for aftertreatment or any kind of troubleshooting, take a look at Technology & Maintenance Council Recommended Practice 551: Root Cause Analysis, which was approved this year.

About the Author

John Baxter

John Baxter is a freelance truck journalist and serves as the technical director of Advance Diesel Concepts, a small venture that is developing a stratified-charge-compression ignition combustion system that will shortly be tested at Argonne National Laboratory. He is a full member of SAE International and a member of the Truck Writers of North America (TWNA) and serves on its Technical Achievement Award committee. Over his long career, he has been employed by a number of the major truck industry publications.

Sign up for FleetMaintenance eNewsletters